<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Flap's California Blog - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-9a7373cb" type="application/json"/><link>http://flapscaliforniablog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://flapscaliforniablog.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:56:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: AD-48: Why Would Roger Hernandez Resign?</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/11/02/ad-48-why-would-roger-hernandez-resign/#comment-703666767</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Speaker has covered up Roger's drug abuse previously. They are all in on it. Roger has given up speaker and a fellow assemblyman who provided him with cocaine in the past. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:56:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: USC &amp;#8211; LA Times Poll: California Proposition 30 Not Winning Hearts and Minds</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/09/28/usc-la-times-poll-california-proposition-30-not-winning-hearts-and-minds/#comment-687646382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Reason-Rupe Poll:&lt;br&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; The poll's sample was made up of 44 percent Democrats, 26 percent &lt;br&gt;Republicans and 24 percent independents. And yet, 62 percent support &lt;br&gt;reducing the number of state government employees, while just 33 percent&lt;br&gt; oppose cutting the state workforce.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Fifty-nine percent of &lt;br&gt;those surveyed say government regulations often do more harm than good. &lt;br&gt;And an even higher number, 65 percent of likely voters, believe the laws&lt;br&gt; and regulations passed by the state legislature make it more likely &lt;br&gt;that businesses will move their jobs to other states. Merely 24 percent &lt;br&gt;think the legislature's actions help create jobs in California.&lt;br&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; I am just saying NO to Prop 30. Even in a poll with a majority &lt;br&gt;Democratic makeup they still want less government spending and believe the government does not have our best interest in mind. So if you &lt;br&gt;want less government spending why in the world would you vote to be able&lt;br&gt; to write them a 6 billion dollar check? ESPECIALLY when California is &lt;br&gt;already the highest taxed state and ESPECIALLY since not 100% will &lt;br&gt;actually go to the schools for which many are basing their vote!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Informed</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 01:22:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: USC &amp;#8211; LA Times Poll: California Proposition 30 Not Winning Hearts and Minds</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/09/28/usc-la-times-poll-california-proposition-30-not-winning-hearts-and-minds/#comment-680344044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The choices made Nov 6 will determine the state's course for&lt;br&gt;years. Both Prop 32, 30 levy significant taxes on Californians.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The wounds that Prop 30, 32 &lt;br&gt;are to heal have been self inflicted largely by elected officials in&lt;br&gt;Sacramento who simply do not say no to any influential  interest group (lobbyists) be they public&lt;br&gt;employees, business, teachers or other unions or environmental groups.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And now the Sacramento politicians and their lobbyists are using&lt;br&gt;Prop 32, 30, 38 to blackmail us.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vote!  Vote No on Prop 32, 30, 38. Save&lt;br&gt;California for our children.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">perspective2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 20:12:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: USC &amp;#8211; LA Times Poll: California Proposition 30 Not Winning Hearts and Minds</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/09/28/usc-la-times-poll-california-proposition-30-not-winning-hearts-and-minds/#comment-680323112</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No way!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Prop 30 is a massive tax increase supported by the tax and spend California Democrats, most notably Governor Jerry Brown.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Prop 32 is opposed to the public employee unions who use payroll deductions from their employees to pay off the Democratic POLS in Sacramento with campaign contributions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vote No on 30 and Yes on 32!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gregory Flap Cole</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:45:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: USC &amp;#8211; LA Times Poll: California Proposition 30 Not Winning Hearts and Minds</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/09/28/usc-la-times-poll-california-proposition-30-not-winning-hearts-and-minds/#comment-680093636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Prop 30, 38 are political blackmail by the Sacramento politicians and their lobbyists.&lt;br&gt;Vote yes on 30, 38, 32 and be successfully FOOLED by the Sacramento lobbyists and their politicians&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">perspective2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:10:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Governor Jerry Brown Takes Action to Try to Lower California Gas Prices</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/10/08/governor-jerry-brown-takes-action-to-try-to-lower-california-gas-prices/#comment-677347300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, if the "winter blend" gas is NOT that detrimental to the environment then why not suspend it indefinitely?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh yeah, I know, don't want to anger the environmental lobby.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gregory Flap Cole</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 09:08:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Governor Jerry Brown Takes Action to Try to Lower California Gas Prices</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/10/08/governor-jerry-brown-takes-action-to-try-to-lower-california-gas-prices/#comment-676887751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bet if we were to ask he'd try to blame it on something nefarious like "supply and demand" like Feinstein wants to do!...snicker...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flicka47</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 01:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Governor Jerry Brown Takes Action to Try to Lower California Gas Prices</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/10/08/governor-jerry-brown-takes-action-to-try-to-lower-california-gas-prices/#comment-676502742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't hear too much about AB32 and climate change, now do we? How about smog? Jerry Brown wants to protect his stupid Prop. 30 which isn't going to pass anyway!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gregory Flap Cole</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:03:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Governor Jerry Brown Takes Action to Try to Lower California Gas Prices</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/10/08/governor-jerry-brown-takes-action-to-try-to-lower-california-gas-prices/#comment-676434083</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny, isn't it, how the Dems are always surprised when things they regulate end up coming up short?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flicka47</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:25:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California 2012 Propositions: Democrats Vs. Republicans &amp;#8211; Part 1</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/08/13/california-2012-propositions-democrats-vs-republicans/#comment-618537922</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Proposition 30 is California Governor Jerry Brown's sponsored initiative and it is a massive sales tax increase with a thrown in upper bracket income tax increase.&lt;br&gt;And, for what?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More wasteful State of California spending from welfare, to higher education to high-speed rail bond interest.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gregory Flap Cole</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:42:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California 2012 Propositions: Democrats Vs. Republicans &amp;#8211; Part 1</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/08/13/california-2012-propositions-democrats-vs-republicans/#comment-618492176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Proposition 30 is bad public policy, horrible tax policy, and an abuse of the democratic initiative process.  It was specifically "electioneered" to circumvent the 2/3rds majority requirement in the California Legislatures--a key taxpayer protection mechanism.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Proposition 30 is the WRONG MEDICINE for what ails California.  It raises taxes without addressing any of the structural and spending issues that have damaged our private-sector economy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;VOTE NO on PROPOSITION 30.  The more people learn about it, the less they like it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://soquelbythecreek.blogspot.com/2012/07/california-proposition-30-governor.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://soquelbythecreek.blogsp...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Soquel by the Creek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:53:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AD-48: Roger Hernandez Says &amp;#8220;There Will Be a Positive Outcome&amp;#8221; in DUI Case</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/08/02/ad-48-roger-hernandez-says-there-will-be-a-positive-outcome-in-dui-case/#comment-617700694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"where there is smoke there is fire".  Roger has been running wild and wreaking havoc everywhere he goes.  The DUI is no surprise; he is often seen out late, at bars, drinking to the point of sloppiness with women much younger than he is.   He is known as a hard partying womanizer, and rumors of violence towards women are circulating.  He was recently seen out partying with Consuelo "Connie" Perez from Porterville, the newely appointed state lottery commissioner, and treasurer for the California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce.  Obviously new to politics, Perez needs to get some pointers from the governor about avoiding Hernandez. The Latino caucus, insiders say, is tiring of the bad PR for them and for the Dems.  His timing for his most recent trouble couldn't come at a worse time for him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">8alatina</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:02:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will California Be Downgraded Like Pennsylvania?</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/07/17/will-california-be-downgraded-like-pennsylvania/#comment-590839464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With the sham budget and the Legislature passing a billion-dollar boondoggle train system, the rating agencies HAVE TO downgrade California.  Otherwise, they'll have NO credibility.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No doubt, California needs spending reform and likely needs additional revenue.  However, when you're ALREADY tops across a broad range of tax categories, you don't have many options.  High public spending and high taxes has only produced a bad business climate, chasing jobs out of the state.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Governor Brown's tax hike, Proposition 30, is horrible tax policy and even worse public policy.  It's an abuse of the democratic process.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;California Proposition 30:  Governor Jerry Brown's Big-Government Tax Hike&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.sfgate.com/nov05election/2012/07/16/no-t-word-dubious-claims-in-gov-browns-ad-for-prop-30/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blog.sfgate.com/nov05el...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Soquel by the Creek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:45:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AD-48: Is Roger Hernandez Safe for Assembly Re-Election?</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/06/26/ad-48-is-roger-hernandez-safe-assembly-re-election/#comment-573229267</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I AM AN INDEPENDENT   MIKE MEZA&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 20:20:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Death Penalty Initiative Faces Legal Challenge</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/05/14/california-death-penalty-initiative-faces-legal-challenge/#comment-541559913</link><description>&lt;p&gt; The very acronym for the “SAFE” Act is bogus.  The costs claimed by SAFE are exaggerated and the costs of the “SAFE” Act’s life imprisonment would be much more expensive due to life-time medical costs, the increased security required to coerce former death-row inmates to work, etc.  The amount “saved” in order to help fund law enforcement is negligible and only for a short period of time.  (It is nothing more than a bribe in a vain effort to obtain conservative votes.)  Bottom line, the “SAFE” Act is another attempt by those who are responsible for the high costs and lack of executions to now persuade voters to abandon it.  Obviously, the arguments of the proponents of the SAFE Act would disappear if the death penalty was carried forth in accordance with the law.  Get the facts at &lt;a href="http://cadeathpenalty.webs.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://cadeathpenalty.webs.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Bernstien</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 23:58:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: City of Los Angeles Bans Supermarket Plastic Bags</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/05/23/city-los-angeles-bans-super-market-plastic-bags/#comment-540665052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about the LA referendum fight?  It's pathetically easy to get a referendum passed in LA -- it's pegged to the mayoral election and no one voted in the last one. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">caseym54</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 21:54:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Death Penalty Initiative Faces Legal Challenge</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/05/14/california-death-penalty-initiative-faces-legal-challenge/#comment-538589366</link><description>&lt;p&gt; The very acronym for the “SAFE” Act is bogus.  The costs claimed by SAFE are exaggerated and the costs of the “SAFE” Act’s life imprisonment would be much more expensive due to life-time medical costs, the increased security required to coerce former death-row inmates to work, etc.  The amount “saved” in order to help fund law enforcement is negligible and only for a short period of time.  (It is nothing more than a bribe in a vain effort to obtain conservative votes.)  Bottom line, the “SAFE” Act is another attempt by those who are responsible for the high costs and lack of executions to now persuade voters to abandon it.  Obviously, the arguments of the proponents of the SAFE Act would disappear if the death penalty was carried forth in accordance with the law.  Get the facts at &lt;a href="http://cadeathpenalty.webs.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://cadeathpenalty.webs.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Bernstien</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:28:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dr. La Donna Porter</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/05/07/yes-on-prop-29-goes-after-dr-la-donna-porter/dr-la-donna-porter/#comment-524914681</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I wont call this 'doctor' any names, but she IS a shill for big tobacco.  Can you imagine taking HER advice on your health?  It would be like going to Dr' Orly Taitz for a root canal!  Scary!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ocseer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:43:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dr. La Donna Porter</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/05/07/yes-on-prop-29-goes-after-dr-la-donna-porter/dr-la-donna-porter/#comment-523649606</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Watch the name calling....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gregory Flap Cole</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 23:42:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dr. La Donna Porter</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/05/07/yes-on-prop-29-goes-after-dr-la-donna-porter/dr-la-donna-porter/#comment-523649126</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Watch the language and racist comments...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gregory Flap Cole</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 23:42:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dr. La Donna Porter</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/05/07/yes-on-prop-29-goes-after-dr-la-donna-porter/dr-la-donna-porter/#comment-523435959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a sham this lying pig is!  She's nothing but a sell-out shill for the Tobacco/Cancer industry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dfabiano</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:39:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dr. La Donna Porter</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/05/07/yes-on-prop-29-goes-after-dr-la-donna-porter/dr-la-donna-porter/#comment-523322793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LaDonna Porter is nothing but an uppity black woman poachig on the  public. She can't even run her own fifnaces let alone a medical practise&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Harry Hurst</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:31:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AD-38: Patricia and Rep. Buck McKeon Still Trying to Shut Down Critical Blog</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/04/25/ad-38-patricia-and-rep-buck-mckeon-still-trying-to-shut-down-critical-blog/#comment-509848128</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't it public knowledge now that Dave Bossert is the Really Patricia? blogger? It's funny he continues to try and hide it! C'mon, Dave, I thought you were a bigger man than that and could own up to it at least! Really Dave?!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JacksonSawyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:21:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AD-38: Patricia McKeon Decides to Meet With REAL VOTERS and Refuses to Attend Debates or Forums</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/04/25/ad-38-patricia-mckeon-decides-to-meet-with-real-voters-and-refuses-to-attend-debates-or-forums/#comment-509349488</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The new sign for Patricia's campaign.  &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=3762928082035&amp;amp;set=a.1055075267407.10205.1541602469&amp;amp;type=1&amp;amp;ref=nf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.facebook.com/photo....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NotABuckBot</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:42:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AD-38: Patricia and Rep. Buck McKeon Still Trying to Shut Down Critical Blog</title><link>http://flapsblog.org/2012/04/25/ad-38-patricia-and-rep-buck-mckeon-still-trying-to-shut-down-critical-blog/#comment-509208784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for posting this Flap and for continuing to cover this debacle of a story. The voters of the 38th Assembly District need to know about this stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CA38thAssembly RaceWatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:26:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>